Court Judgement versus Executive Decision

25Oct2018

नौकशाही के आगे सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की भी नही चलती है जब नौकरशाही एक संग मिल कर मूर्खता की चादर ओढ़े कुछ करती हैं।

रात के 2 बजे सीबीआई निर्देशक आलोक वर्मा को जबरन पद निरस्त करने का आदेश निकाला गया है जबकि सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के फैसलों के अनुसार निर्देशक का कार्यकाल 2 सालों के लिए सुनिश्चित (guaranteed) है।

यह है नौकरशाही का असली दम सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के फैसलों के आगे।

---------–--–-----―-------------

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Origin of the word "Jugaad"

Jugaad , recorded as "  जुगाड़ " , in the native variant of Hindi around the regions of Western UP and in the Haryanavi dialect , from the proper Hindi word   Jugat , "  जुगत". Jugat , in turn , in an improper word for it's parent Sanskrit word Yukt ,  युक्त .  Yukt has two meanings in its original Sanskrit form . It means a carefully planned, schemed, arrangement to achieve an objective. Towards this meaning, the usages are like,  " कुछ युक्ति लगानी होगी /  " (meaning, we will have to apply some brain , some scheme to achieve this objective ). In this context , the most common of the scheme that would be adopted would be the team-work, the co-operation of everyone's body and mind to resolve the crisis situation.       The other meaning of Yukt comes in the form of a suffix, wherein it mean "laden of", or, "involved with". Like in the case, "  यह दोष -युक्त वस्तु है / " (this object is filled with faults ).   ...
Read more

The problem with India Against Corruption (www.indiaagainstcorruption.org)

So, It's happening in the same manner in which it should be envisaged by a low IQ nation as India. The crusade of India Against Corruption   has turned into a personal war between Five-off-Five!  The one batch of five being that from the government and the another five from another organisation calling themselves 'India against corruption' working under the umbrella of an organisation called Civil Society group. I dislike this and I dislike it more when i see Indians time and again falling into the trap of proving "who is honest"! U see, first they put the blame on Sharad Pawar, and now the blame is on Shashi Bhushan, who is trying to prove that he is not dishonest. And slowly the crusade is hijacked away into a personal battle to prove whether person X is honest or not.!!? Isn't it funny that we the nation of 1.2 billion people have failed to figure out where exactly does this dishonest and it's hypocrisy lies!! We think it is in those 543, the parliame...
Read more

Semantics and the mental aptitude in the matters of law

It is in accordance with the flow of logic, the principles of natural justice and in all the democractic laws that the one who is presenting a claim has also to bear the burden to prove that claim. But there is a catch in this. Catch is that in our day today discourse, by a semantic turn of the statement- the language and the grammar- a 'claim' can be made to appear like a mere doubt, a suspicion or even simpler - a trivial cross-examination. The effect of this 'twisting' by usage of the Linguistic is that the 'burden of proof' appears shifted , away from the one who maybe challenging an evidence while appearing to be merely a doubting Thomas, or a cross-examining lawyer. In the field of Journalism, the news-men apply this effect of converting what may be an solemn legally valid evidence, into a 'claim' or an 'accusation', by presenting that news matter in the form of a doubt, or a suspicion. This, they can do under the cover of another valid...
Read more