Donate US$10

objective people

Truth seekers are never a pro-'X' or anti-'X'. To be objective one has to judge 'X' quite impartially. You can reach to the truth only when you are objective, detached from your personal likeness or dislikeness for 'X', 'Y', ...and all the people.
   Un-detached People might think of you as a confused man who is sometimes behaving pro-X and other times, anti-X. But the purpose of your objectivity appears only on the day of War. To stand by the truth, you first need to know which side is the truth. Your entire hard work, of being objective, of being detached , raises its fruit on this day when you make your call. It is like this that your instincts perform better today. Without objectivity of your conducts, your instincts are typically a subservient of your emotions.
    Indeed it is these pro-X and anti-X people who are the blind followers, the perpetrators of evil. These are the ones who refuse to analyse 'X' objectively all through , thereof giving him encouragement to do whatever he wanted.

"Save Water" campaign -- a clever way of spreading impoverishment in the state

Instead of the Government asking of people to save water, the people should ask the government to install machinery and mechanism to generate and channel more water.
   Does the campaign of 'save water' inscribe in it consuming water lesser than how much should be made available average per person per day ? Then , how do we know we are consuming less or more?

 Stop doing Corruption , water and all the shortfalls will be automatically filled up.

 'Save water' campaign is the secret ways the Governments bring about poverty while still appearing to be pro-poor.

what's a sick humor

Humor has a way to calm your worried mind when uncertainties loom large and the way out is not known. The one big risk we should not forget when are resorting to being Humorous is that it should not become a complete substitution of the solution-finding aptitude. Humor can bring a temporary relief, the long term relief is only in striving to find the solutions of the challenge we are faced with.

    Being Humorous is a habit-forming mental condition. You derive pleasure , so much and so hard that you become sickly addicted to being sarcastic , being 'always-smiling'-noticed, in place of being a solution-finder. Be happy, stay cheerful but don't forget to look for the true answer and solutions.

the communists of India

the associated political outfit of Naxalism is the banned party CPI(M). It stands for the Communist Party of India (Maoist).
     It is notable that Communism in India has grown heavily around the region where Caste Feudalism has been too high. Apart front that the tribal population has been significant.
  In europe, the Karl Marx Communism was a line of thought created from the rise of middle class during the Industrial Revolution. The growing labour related issues of that time seemed to give *likely* glimpse of the future, to Karl Marx, about how the world would result out some centuries later. He wrote those idea in books such as 'Das Capital' , which gave the world the concept of Communism.
    Distances away, in China , a local leader's ascendancy to power through ouster of the monarchy gave to the world the Mao Zedong's idea of Communism. Mao was influenced from Marx, but his approach to achieve that end through the violent means, and contrastedwith Marx idea of the middle-class take-over of governance, caused the Mao approach to be named as Maoism. The practitioner, ofcourse as Maoists, as the english grammar works on. The indian communist as Maoist for the possible cause of its connection with the caste-based feudalism which the lower class population had suffered in the region.
     Nevermind that. The problem it now serves is that as the CPI rule lead to decline of industries in the Governance regions, people seem to develop aversion for these policies, resultingly , becoming averse to the labour laws as a whole.
      Whatever the fight be about , the cultural outlook of these regions is typically hostile and averse to the foremost things- the laws. They, no more, understand the common law practises, they no-more accept anything in lore of the Social/Public welfare, and they no-more like to hear of anything even remotely touching the labour laws favourable to the workers as against to the employers.
       In my thinking, the cultural outlook has a kind of a 'communist' complex, a psychometric aversion to certain a Marxist Communism related ideas. There is extreme ignoramity about the laws as a whole, where , even if someone takes up a slight conversation of how a certain Contract terms is being violated, or a labour law is being breached, the person begins to sound like 'legalist' to the communist-complexed people. 'Legalist' , in history and philosophy, is the name of a chinese philosophy on how to perform work, said to be originated from chinese philosopher Confucius (also known as Tao), when he laid the idea as 'Fa, Sha, Shui' (do work as spoken, record it, ...) . This idea from Confucius was mainly meant for the then Civil Servants, the aim being to obtain a good public governance. This chinese philosopher is actually credited as the first personin the world to have conducted written exams for entry into the Civil Services.
        Overtime, his philosophy of doing things in writing, called as the Legalism by historians of future, vanished due to other causes. But it still did leave behind this highly successful idea being practised even to this date.
   The indian communist, surely a very ''grammar and semantic'' -challenged person does a misnomer by labelling per who talk about the Contract laws, the Labor issues, the welfare idea as the 'Legalist', and as said before, suffer from a kind of a complex generated from their cultural and political climate of Communism and Feudalism combined. As a result of these complexes, the violations of the about laws is very common and very commonly acceptable in their lives. No wonders, the west already labels the Indians as ''someone who don't keep their Contracts''.


     People from the communist governed states in India seem to have developed an anti-communist attitudes. Anything which sounds even remotely likely what their governments have hatefully done is resisted without any mental enquiry of its lawfulness.
     Labour laws, I have seen, whenever reminded or invoked , are protested by the natives of these states with a zeal and a claim of ''red flag is trying to soar high into the organisation''. Unfortunately this conduct, a definite consequence of ignoramity and attitudinal resistance, creates actual unlawfullness and violations of labour laws, thereby creating the truely honest eligible dissatisfied people.

Retirement Send-offs

Retirement Send-offs are very emotional movement. Or, they should have been so unless ofcourse our attitudinal Commondification did not take-over our Emotional Intelligence to respond appropriately to a given emotion. It's is surprising that we Indians who are so much into watching that Emotionally 'masala'-rich bollywood produces , in our real lives are acutely de-sensitive of emotionally appropriate responses. Sometimes it makes me doubt if bollywood is doing to the society on the emotional front or is it working to strip our people of the sensitivity through a clever way of over-feeding dislikeness.
 People give more attention to food, the dresses, to meeting the seniors and giving 'respect' to them (to score the promotion brownie points) than to feel or express the depth of the occasion. It goes like that in Shaadi, Birthdays, and all that. Parties have become our heartless attitudinal way of deriving 'pleasure', almost an addictive habit with no real and no emotional purpose.
We are truly decaying.

क्या तुम्हे मालूम भी है की तुम्हारी गलती क्या है?

क्या तुम्हे मालूम भी है की तुम्हारी गलती क्या है?

   तुम्हारी गलती यह है की तुम नियमों को ताकत के प्रवाह के रूप में देखते हो, "आपसी सहमति" के रूप में नहीं । तुम्हे बार-बार "भारत एक प्रजातंत्र देश है " याद दिलाने का मेरा मकसद यही है की कोई भी नियम बनाने से पहले पूछ लिया करो , क्योंकि नियम बनाना तुम्हार एकाकेक अधिकार नहीं है, यह "आपसी सहमति" का सम्बन्ध है । प्रजातंत्र की मूल मंशा यही थी और यही है, चाहे तो ब्रिटिश दार्शनिक बेर्तंड रुस्सेल से लेकर अदम स्मिथ किसी को भी पढ़ लो । जब मेरे और मेरी देश की सरकार के बीच का सम्बन्ध भी 'आपसी सहमति' का ही है , तब नियम बनाने का एकाकी अधिकार तुम्हे दिया किसने ? तुम्हे कहाँ से मिला ?
    असल में तुम गाँव से आये एक जमीदारी मानसिकता के आदमी हो, जिसकी समझ में यही उतरा हुआ है की नियम किसी एक के विवेकाधिकार से ही बनाते है । यही तुम्हारी सर्वप्रथम भ्रान्ति है । हम 'आपसी सहमति' से काम करते है, किसी और की मर्ज़ी से नहीं ।
    हाँ, एक बार जब आपसी सहमति बन जाती है तब जब हम शरीफों जैसे काम करने लगते है। तब तुम और तुम जैसे न जाने कितने ही ग्रामीण देहाती जमीदारी मसिकता के लोग हम लोगों की शराफत को अपने "पॉवर" का नुमाइश समझ बैठते है और फिर ऐसे-ऐसे फेर बदल करते है जो की आपसी सहमति से बने नियम के मूल दांचे में ही अनधिकृत छेड़खानी कर देता है । तुम जीवन को "कुछ अंधे मनुष्य और हाथी" वाली पंचतंत्र की कहानी से मिलती स्मृति में दखते हो । जब हम शराफत से आदेशों का पालन करते नज़र आते हैं तब तुम इसे अपना एकाकाकी अधिकार समझ लेते हो और इसके पीछे की 'आपसी सहमति' को पहचान नहीं पाते हो । यह तुम्हारे मस्तिष्क की अयोग्यता है , जो तुम्हारा स्वभाव बन चुका है ।
    यह हम सब को पता है की भारत में कुछ भी काम ठीक से नहीं चलता । इसलिए करीब-करीब सब ही इसकी बुराई , आलोचना में लगे दिखते है । मगर इस आलोचना में भी दो अलग मक्साद वाले लोग छिपे है , यह हमे अच्छे से पता है । एक आलोचना होती है विश्लेषण के मकसद से , सुधार लाने के लिए , बदलाव प्राप्त करने के लिए । और एक आलोचना होती है "सब कुछ और सब ही ऐसे गलत है " की भ्रान्ति लाने के लिए जिससे की कल को खुद के गलत निर्णय , कर्तव्यों का उलंघन , असक्षमता को न्यायोचित करने के लिए । यह आलोचना भारत की त्रासदी को और बड़ाने के लिए होती है , समाधान के लिए नहीं । यह उदंडता है , कुप्रचार है ।
    एकाकी अधिकार के रूप में निर्णय लेना ज़मीदारी मानसिकता है । 'आपसी सहमति' व्यवसायिकता है । हम व्यवसायिक सम्बन्ध रखना चाहते है, तुम हमे अपना गुलाम समझते हो । और तो और इस आपसी सहमति की व्यवसायिक समझ की कमी की वजह से ही तुमने हमारे संसथान के व्यवसाय और धन-लाभ पर भी ठोकर लगा राखी है । तुम नियमों को अपने एकाकी अधिकार में देखते हो इसलिए उनका पालन भी नहीं करते हो । उसके बाद याद दिलाये जाने पर यह धमकाते हो की "अगर सब नियम से ही चलने लगा तो फिर तुम्हे भी हम दिखा देंगे की तुम कितने नियम-बद्ध हो "।
    तुम्हारे इस मानसिकता से ही देश और समाज नष्ट हो रहे है । तुम हमे नियम विरोधी होने को कह रहे होते हो । हम में से जो राजनीतिक समझ नहीं रखेगा कल को वह ऐसे जवाब स्वीकार करके नियमों से घृणा ही सीखेगा और फिर एक 'शहरी नक्सलवादी' ही बनेगा । नियम क्या है और कैसे , किस इंसानियत , मानवता , दया और करुणा से लगाये जाने चाहिए क्या अब इस्पे बहस और इसका सबक भी हमे ही तुम्हे सिखाना होगा । क्या तुम यह कहना चाहते हो की अगर नियम को कड़ाई से लागू किया तब सिर्फ हम ही उसके भुग्तभोगी बनेंगे, और तुम कभी भी नहीं । क्या तुमने अपना सारा जीवन हमेश नियम-बद्ध ही गुज़ारा है । अगर नहीं, तब क्या दया, करुणा और इंसानियत का सबक तुम्हे क्या हम देना पड़ेगा ? क्या तुम्हरे माँ-बाप, शिक्षकों और तुम्हारे जीवन ने तुम्हे यह कभी नहीं सिखाया ? विवेकहीन कड़ाई से नियमों के प्रति जो मानव हृदय में जो घृणा उत्पन्न होती है , उसका ज़िम्मेदार कौन होगा। क्या तुम्हे समझ है की नियमों से घृणा की यह मानसिकता ही आज नक्सल वाद की वजह बनी है , और इस घृणा का करक है तुम जैसे विवेकहीन कार्यपालक जो अनुचित कड़ाई से नियमों को लगो करते है जिससे लोग उनकी 'पॉवर' के काबू में रहे।
     और अगर कड़ाई विवेक-संगत है , तन उस कड़ाई को हो ही जाने दो, क्योंकि वह आवश्यक है । अगर वह विवेक पूर्ण है तब वह 'आपसी सहमति' है । क्या तुम हमे मुर्ख समझते हो को किसी विवेकपूर्ण समझ में नियमों की कड़ाई से पालन के लिए भी हम 'ना' कर देंगे ।
  गलती तुम्हारी है । तुम कई सारी भ्रांतियों से भरे हुए हो । खुले, स्वच्छ , सरल मस्तिष्क से नहीं देखते और समझते ।

Between you and I this is what the problem is !

तुम्हारे और मेरे बीच में समस्या यह नहीं है की मैं ज्यादा ज्ञानवान बनने की कोशिश करता हूँ , समस्या यह है की तुम ज्ञान-विरोधी व्यवहार रखते हो ।
    ऐसा नहीं है की "मैं कुछ ज्यादा ही जानता हूँ", बल्कि तुम ही जीवन और प्रकृति की भौतिक समझ नहीं रखते हो ।
    ऐसा नहीं है की मैं कानूनची बनने की चाह रखता हूँ, ज्यादा ही नियम-कानून बतियाता हूँ; तुम ही साधारण नियम, प्रमाण की सहज जानकारी , इन सब की कम समझ रखते हो ।
     गलती मेरी नहीं है , गलती तुम्हारी है की तुम कम-बुद्धि, क्षिद्र-विश्लेषण योग्यता के हो, और उसके ऊपर शिक्षा विरोधी व्यवहार भी अपना लेते हो, भले ही इसके बाद तुम चाहे जितना भी अपनी शिक्षा और योग्यता के प्रमाणों से मुझे और दुनिया को प्रभावित करने की कोशिश कर लो ।

        Between you and me, the problem is not of my eruditism, it is of your anti-educationism.
       It is not that 'I Know more', it is because you lack the foundation knowledge of ,most things in life and nature.
         It is not because I am too much into Legality, but that you do not have understanding of the Common Law.          
         Problem is not here, you are lacking in IQ and then adopting an anti-educationist behaviour, however hard you may try to impress on me your education and qualification credentials.

निबन्ध क्यों लिखे जाते हैं ?

निबन्ध क्यों लिखे जाते हैं ? 

 मुझे गहरा यकीन है की कम से कम 90% हम भारतीय तो यही समझते हैं की निबन्ध-लेखन का मकसद किसी परीक्षा , जैसे लोक सेवा आयोग , या 12वी के ISC Board में छात्रों की अंग्रेजी भाषा में कुशलता नापने का होता हैं |
     निबन्ध और ब्लॉग लेखन में काफी अंतर होता है ।
 एक वेबसाईट ( से प्राप्त इस प्रश्न का उत्तर की 'निबन्ध-लेखन का सही प्रयोजन क्या होना चाहिए' कुछ इस प्रकार है :-
         अंग्रेजी भाषा में निबन्ध के लिए शब्द 'Essay ' को अधिकाँशतः लोग ये समझते है की एक प्रकार की लेखन-क्रिया को Essay कहा जाता है | मगर अंग्रेजी के शब्द Essay का मूल शब्द जो की फ्रेंच भाषा के प्रभावों से आता है , Essay-लेखन के सही प्रयोजनों की समझने में मदद-गार होगा । फ्रेंच भाषा में भी इसका मूल शब्द लेटिन भाषा से आता है जो की exigere है | इस शब्द का अर्थ होता है " जांच करना , परीक्षण करना , या सीधे शाब्दिक मूल में 'अर्थ निकलना' । "
        तो इस प्रकार Essay शब्द के प्राचीन शब्द की खुदाई कर के दूंडने से जो पता चलता उसे कुछ ऐसे वरणित किया जा सकता है की "निबन्ध-लेखन का प्रयोजन होता है छात्रों की प्रेरित करना की वह किसी भी विषय पर अपने विचारों को लिख कर आम- विचारों से जांच कारवाएं , परीक्षण करे की उनके विचार सही , तर्संगत और आम-स्वीकृत हैं की नहीं | "
         ( ऐसे में जाहिर है की निबन्ध लेखन में विवादास्पद विचार का लेखन भी आते है , क्यों की तभी उनका मुआयना होगा | निबंध-लेखन के अर्थ में 'विवादों से दूर रहे' का प्रयोजन निबन्ध-लेखन की भावनाओं के विपरीत है । हालाँकि , परीक्षा के तर्क से छात्रों को हमेशा यही सिखाया जाता है की निबन्ध- लेखन के दौरान विवादास्पद विचारों से दूर रहे क्योंकि आपके परीक्षक के विचारों से टकराव की अवस्था में आपके अंक कट जाने का भय होगा | )
         निबन्ध के अर्थ में लेखन में छोटे प्रभावशाली लेखों को कहा जाता हैं , जिसके दौरान छात्रों से कुछ अध्ययन से सम्बंधित ख़ास कौशलों को तीव्र (सान देने ) करने की अपेक्षा करी जाती है , जैसे की बारीकी से लेखअंशों को पढना और अर्थ गृहीत करना (Close reading ), विश्लेषण करना (analysis), तुलना करना और विषमता दूदना (समानताएं और विषमताएं, Comparison and Contrast ), शंकाओं का निवारण करना (persuasion ), संक्षिप्त होना (Concise -ness ), विचारों की स्पष्टता (Clarity ), और एक प्रस्ताव (कभी-कभी जोखिम भरा हुआ भी) सभी के विचारों के लिए रखना (Exposition) |
        ऊपर लिखे व्यक्तव्य से यह तो प्रमाणित होने ही लगेगा की निबन्ध-लेखन से छात्रों में किन-किन खासियतों का विकास होना चाहिए जब कोई छात्र वाकई में निबन्ध-लेखन में प्रवीण होने का प्रयास करेगा |
        निबन्ध लेखन का उद्देश्य होता है छात्र को प्रेरित करना की वह अपने खुद के विचारों की टटोले और विकसित करे- उन विचारों की लेखन की क्रिया के दौरान, और उनको आस-पास के अन्य विचारों से जोड़े और दिशा दे , (यहाँ हमे निबन्ध-लेखन को किसी शोध-पत्र लेखन के ठीक विपरीत अर्थ में देखना चाहिए जिसमे की छात्र केवल शोध किये गए व्यक्तव्य ही लिखता है , अपने खुद के विचार नहीं | ) तो इस प्रकार निबन्ध-लेखन अपनी खुद की प्रकृति से ही छोटे , संक्षिप्त , स्पष्ट, और दिशा-संगत होना ही चाहिए | निबन्ध-लेखन में छात्र ज़रा सा भी अपने विचारों की रेलगाड़ी (train of thoughts) को भटकने का जोखिम नहीं ले सकता है , और दिशा-हीन नहीं करा सकता है , यानि मुद्दे से जुदा नहीं हो सकता है। निबन्ध-लेखन में लेखन को पहले से सोच-विचार कर के , रूचि-पोषित शैली में ही लिखा जाता है |

Subservience in human psychology

"Autocracy is not just nurtured on one's whims. It has deep roots in acceptance and servitude of followers."

I was having some thoughts on the same topic. Free-will is not possible to exist in every human. Humans are a typical mix of conscitious being and un-conscitious beings. Not everyone can succeed in being self-aware, self-knowledgeable, and all that. In terms of Maslov's theory 'pyramids of needs', not all can reach the highest level of 'self actualisation', that is, well risen above the basic animal needs of Food and Sex.
    So, if statistically the population is largely not into the self-consciousness, they need be 'guided and Taught' (=dominated) by those who are. It is desired by the good 'self-consciousness' men that all the people be trained to work from their free-will right from the child hood, but then aspirations and realities differ. That makes human a typical subjects of dominance, domestication by their own species.
  We might already be having a scientifically studied explanation for servitude in humans in subjects of Psychology. This evolutionary aspect might have contributed in the social evolution of humans.
  If Saudi Arabia has the Sharia laws to arrange deliver the subjugation effects on the larger population, the evolved British Democracy has found a democratic incarnation of such laws in the form of 'Anti-social Behavior laws' which are applied at certain crowded places to teach the visitors and 'citizenry' to conduct themselves rightly in order to avoid punishment. A kind of 'moral policing' is actively conducted in such places which are notified by law to be venue for these laws. The human actions which have been scientifically studied to be Anti-social are well described, such as Kissing, PDA, playing music in loud volume, smoking, drinking, talking or laughing in high voice, etc, and displayed for common knowledge, and later punished.
      NPD is also likely to be sowed in the old animal instincts of humans. It will not be easy to make progress well, as a society, if we do not keep all members arrest with the minimal earnings the society has already achieved. Each newborn child might just revert back to animal days if not provided the 'good' education, you know.

the decaying culture

I am ready for a cricket betting. I will bet that a given match is fixed, or a given spot event is fixed. I know it's a certain bet which I am almost sure to win. All that I need to do is to pass some incentives of my betting profits to be passed to the police for lawfully exposing that my bet was correct.
    Maybe the police will also start becoming 'fixed' some day, if a such a bet takes us on. But in this entire loss and defeat we all will learn in our collective conscience how the decay of a society begins. How a nation can first be culturally suffocated and then militarily seiged.
        India has got it wrong in its collective conscience the Social Theory , how a society evolves , what is morality, what are ethics and what role they play in the Social Theory. Social Theory is a proceeding work for the Nation-state theories. Flags and national anthems are mere symbolic representations of Nation. Maybe we will continue to give so called respect and tribute to the Tricolour and Rashtra-gaan, but will be nothing beyond that for a nation attributes. What didn't happen ever in our history, that we could survive as one Bharat since the times of Mahabharata, the event where the British Raj India Civil Servants obtained the name for this subcontinental land, will repeat soon. Maybe what our established history is all about is just about to recur- to be taken over by external forces. Maybe the loss was just not about the loss of 'Golden Peacock' , the proverbial 'bird of gold', it was, in deep, a loss of collective conscience when we discovered ways of compromise to ensure our Survival against the external aggressors. Maybe our Compromise Culture will provoke some new aggressors to take us over.
    We practised caste system. The brahmins were the top layers. The shudra at the bottom. But perhaps, as a whole the Caste which can be called Indians is nothing but very low on Intelligence and Intellectualism. Manu described those people who involved in society building, those imparting knowledge to the remaining as the Brahmins. In a twist of logic, those who were born from the widely accepted Brahmins also started claiming the Brahmins status. The Caste brahmins were born, as against the meritorious People whom the society revered as the Brahmins. The Caste brahmins involved themselves in creating more caste. More severely the lower caste. They did just opposite of what all duties were incharged to the merit Brahmins.
    It's a 180 degree opposite world now, of what Manu had ever desired. There are no forces remaining who are on duty to build the society. There are only the Caste- brahmins. We had decayed centuries ago, and sixty years since independence we are on the same path again.

Chronically corrupt culture - Where should we be looking for Hypocrisy

   India has seriously become a very corrupt country. By corruption, I imply the entire long range of activities which are described in various anti-corruption laws. I strictly do not restrain it to mere bribing.
    In the present day India , there are very minimalist forces existence which can inspire or force the citizenry to not to become corrupt. The force of political laws, the religious sermons, the economic conditions - are are always working so to bring citizenry to corruption. The few forces which remain to work towards a corruption-free society is the force of fantasical bollywood stories in the cinema, or , some ancient mythological tales of 'Good winning over the evil'.
   As life would have it, Reality wins over the imaginary, the sum resultant of all these forces is to help make our nation a chronically corrupt, corruption going deep into our culture.
   The present generation of India can be divided into three classes of men, with respect to the Cultural Corruption.
    The feeblist group of people who do not involve themselves in any form of corruption at all.
   The 'critically' corrupt men, who do corruption however by managing the feeling of guilt by an agreeable criticism of the Cultural environment of India.
    The 'mis-propagandist' corrupt men, who do corruption but by way of projecting the all-pervading ills of Indian political, judiciary and executive systems thereof joining the flow without any sense of duty towards the society.
    Osho Rajneesh once said that the there is no greater sin than the feeling of guilt.
   So , it is puzzling and intriguing to explore how did the vast citizenry of India overcome the sin-feelings, 'feeling of guilt' in doing those actions which has enough logical evidences to be established as anti-social.
       Indeed it is in the puzzle that we may be able to discover and find differentiation between the perceivably 'honest' citizens and the 'dishonest' citizen. When it will come to judging the 'honesty' factor there will ever more minuscule group to successfully pass the test. But , if we may correctly apply the theory and understanding of what is Hypocrisy, there is likely a good large citizenry who are 'honest' , even when their actions may not confirm to the standards of Honesty. Indeed from amongst the 'critically'-corrupt and the 'mis-propagandist' corrupt , the real evil lies in the latter club who are capitalizing on the imperfections of our Political, Judicial and Executive structures for their immoral gains.
      To understand fundamentally how the 'critically'-corrupt differ from the 'mis-propaganda'-corrupt, we will to understand how 'Criticism' differs from 'Mis-propaganda'.
       Recently , the national airlines, the Air-India, sacked one of it's employee Pilot on the charges of mis-propaganda. The young Pilot had made a youtube music album describing the wrongs of his employers. The contest came around that in exercise of his freedom of expressions, he was merely 'criticising' the organisation. The employers contested that despite the imperfections present in the organisation, the aim was not criticism, but mis-propaganda because he had never contested, in writing or in actions, those claims which he had expressed in his amateur music video.
      A critic exercises the freedom of expression to duly expose the imperfections, both inside the organisation and when unable to find justice, outside the organisation. His agenda to see the justified change, an improvement.
    A mis-propagandist exercises expression to expose the imperfections of system, but mostly in unwritten , verbal, form so to form a foundations of explaining his own misdoings and incompetencies. His agenda is not about seeing a change , because he never contested the imperfection against the organisation, in letter or in action; but to capitalize personal gains through participating in those imperfections. This is the real villain of India's chronic problem as on today. He is the Hypocrite who appears to be expressing the 'criticism' , but not with intentions to reform them, but to justify his own mis-doings and incompetencies. A non-hypocrite critic is one who even participating in the dishonest actions, criticises the system/organisation with the agenda to see the change. He will show some signs of discharge of duty, a sense of responsibility in compliance with the law.
   In a chronically corrupt culture, The hypocrisy is not exactly to be judged in action against Intentions. It is to be judged in the agenda of Criticism- a desire to see change, or, to lay foundations to justify own's misdoings.

What is the 'Power' of a government executive?

What is the 'Power' of a government executive? Or any other executive for that matter.

  Essentially the Power of government executive is his judicious decision-making in order to achieve his business obligations when a number of business obligations are in inter-play. When an executive has duty to fulfill a number of obligations of which not all can be achieved together, the judicious decisions he exercises as to which obligations to fulfill and which to skip, that action in itself emerges out as his Power.
In other words, it is principally the knowledge power alone which he has. He has to maintain a knowledge of various business obligations which surround his decisions.

How the treatment of consequences of Discretion differs from treatment of Decision-making

The power of Discretion is most certainly to be differed from the duty to make judicious decisions.
       Dictionary defines Discretion as 'making a judicious choice'. However, in law, whether the choice is judicious or not becomes a matter of intense debate, which enforces law and management to create distinction between Decision-making and Discretion.
      Every man born has a discretion available to him. Shakespeare tells us that a man is a slave because he has so chosen to be. He can always liberate himself by taking his own life. Thus a most fundamental discretion to commit suicide exist with everyone.
     Other times ,people in authority have discretion, desired and undesired, to pick people 'at random' from the lot for exercise of authority. A policeman on duty has discretion on whom to pick when a number of people are in violation of speed limit law. No judge, no person can argue with him , 'why did you pick me only for overspeeding? Why not the next guy? '. Thus, the law reluctantly agrees to this power of discretion to policemen. However if it be technically possible, the law would want all the overspeeding guys to be pulled-over. This, with the aim to reduce discretion which the policeman ,in one possibility, might have applied with vested interest motives against that person. Also the agenda of law, that is, law abiding for everyone's safety will be most sincerely achieved now.
          We all stand in violation of one law or the other at some point of time. The policeman and other all government authorities too. So, the power of discretion of 'A' against 'B' is an unavoidable inconvenience.
      In contrast, in a decision-making exercise, the policeman has duty to pick only the wrong-doer when he is investigating a case where some people are law compliant and some are not. He arrests only those people who are in violation with respect to the case he is investigating. He has no duty and no business to arrest people for those violations which are not in the purview of his investigations. Most certainly because even the policemen can be demonstrated to not be 100% law-abiding all his life. Thus decision-making is an exercise certainly avoiding the random liberty to choose. This reduces the inconveniences which may otherwise happen in a discretion. A non-judicious decision is a bad decision. There can be case of judicious decision but the unwanted outcomes. Such decisions are not punished. Bad decisions with agreeable outcomes are either reprimanded or punished as the case may call.
     This situation is meant to describe difference between Discretion and Decision-making.
      Decision-making is a conscious exercise of choice from a range of options available. The creation of these options is through various business contracts and legal duties. Discretion is 'random' exercise of choice from an unlimited range, which may sometime even bear a secret agenda as there is no range offered.
    When an executive chooses to skip all the available options from the range available to him, and acts from outside these choices, he is technically in exercise of discretion. Law prefers decision-making over discretion. The diagnosis of secret agenda in a discretion is very difficult. One party or other will always allege a secret motive to be the cause of exercise of a given discretion, which the law would find difficult to verify.
        People who are not in knowledge of this distinction between Discretion and Decision-making often mistakenly invoke the 'power of discretion' to establish the motive of their bad-decision. Power of Discretion is accorded to people by force of law itself because the ultimate aim of law is to prevent harms, in which a case of the harms happening due to adherence to the law are also accounted. The investigation must check that when a range of choices is available of which one decision has been picked , which turned out to be bad decision, the decision-maker should not escape the consequences of this bad decision. Often , it is by a misplaced use of vocabulary that bad decisions and it's consequences are escaped , first by labeling his power exercise as 'his discretion' and then invoking the statutory protections made avail to certain fundamental discretions.
   Discretions with unwanted outcomes are simply punished.

The 'torture' of MMD through oral examinations

Examining the responses of mariners on the FB group topic “howto load elephants cargo on merchant ships”, a different point-of-view will help reveal to all what is the idea of Torture which is often alleged by the candidate against the MMD.
Many seafarers attempted answers this real life challenge, if it were ever to happen to them on their ship, from a mindset of as though sitting in an examination. The two categories of the responses , “oh, it’s harassment to ask such questions”, and “you have to have an answer for the MMD surveyor which he should accept”, speak of what is the idea of ‘Torture’ all about. The kind of psychometric seizure from which these two type-categories responses come are the examples of what the MMD ‘tortured’ candidates start to behave like .
These conducts are quite similar to how a badly traumatized person conducts himself after being burnt by hot water once in his life. The English language proverbial citation of this conduct is ‘once bitten ,twice shy’, - when a person adopts a mental block after suffering a trauma.
Examining the aspects of how this ‘torture’ comes about, the philosophical concept of ‘Dualism of nature’ will have be invoked in the first place so to reveal the mechanism of this ‘torture’.
While the larger purpose of asking such questions by an examiner could be about knowing his skills of handling the strange cargoes, the question will definitely be presented to the candidate as a particular cargo, say the Elephant loading in this case.
Further, the issues of personality disorders of people, be it the surveyors or the candidates is an presumed idea.
So, during this exam, the conduct of the examiner towards the candidate when already enquired odd , strange question will become the only measuring stick of what could be the genuine purpose of asking this question. This uncertainty would be enough to increase the stress load on an already stressed candidate to take central idea of such questions being a method to traumatically defeat him.
 The absence of a general courteous conduct of the examiner towards the candidate, absence of explanatory notes on the themes of this question, will keep mounting the uncertainty in the mind of the candidate as to what the examiner is wanting from him.
To prove, or atleast to signal is genuineness to the candidates so that the candidate does not become unduly psychologically upset after hearing the questions, the MMD examiner should take measures to sooth the candidates about his motives, intentions, purposes before he sets out to ask his first question.  
Ofcourse the notion of ‘Torture’ has often been scrupulously invoked by many a candidates, so to induce examiner to ask him comparatively easier questions. However, the ‘torture’ idea is not to mean the questions should be deliberately scaled down in the difficulty level; the idea is only about conveying the purposes of asking the questions to the candidates. Some techniques which can be involved so to clear the purpose theme of the candidates could be like accepting the candidates point of view and real-life observations relevant with the question.  Sharing one’s own real-life experiences pertaining to the theme of the question can also help ease the stress and trauma of the candidate. Examiner can do this info-sharing after having done with the examination. Such informal-looking exchanges have a great value in setting the ambience of examination for other candidates who will come this examiner in future. 

"How to load elephants on merchant ships?"

Recently a conversation broke out on this topic in the Facebook group of Jobships (

Here is a copy-paste work of what all conversation transpired during the above.

AT (Thread starter) :somebody tell me how to load elephant in a general cargo vessel? question asked in cochin mmd

The responses which this thread generated were a reflection of how the human mind becomes entrapped into its own design more specifically when its is overwhelmed by something or someone.
Here is a copy-paste of some various responses which came out and what I contributed in the topic

DS :hard to find mentally stable elephants in kerala......reject the cargo or signoff......

NG :surveyor who r asking for this type of question must sent in kerala forest for 6 months exp.

GC : Has Capt. Das reached Cochin.... its his fav question....

AS :Tell him to ask director prabu solomon who directed a movie about elephant.

NG :open the cargo hold, put the elephant, close the cargo hold

MS :Can livestock cargo be loaded on a general cargo ship? Does the certificate issued to the ship allow for the carriage of livestock cargo?

RMR : elephants or any animal cannot be loaded in a closed cargo hold..unless its a livestock carrier or a val that has forced ventilation ... to load elephants... the weight of an elephant is 2 to max gen cargo ship... put it in a cage or open type or oversized container ...lift it using the crane and lower it into the hold a general cargo vessel where the hold has ventilation and east access..feeding the elephant in the voyage is required deck not permitted as it is exposed to the weather... the cargo near the elephant should also not give out strong smell ... and the elephant also urinates and excretes waste that can damage. many things to take into account..preferably a empty hold on top of the tween deck. .. ..if the val has certificate to load animals that is..

AV : Jokes apart ....and think about loading them.....This question has originated from the actual loading of elephants required onboard the SCI ships at Andaman and Nicobar. There is a complete sensible procedure to load elephants onbaord those small ships and various requirements for keeping them onboard!!!!

GC :Appoint a Mahaout through shippers. ..............let the Mahaout walk the elephant into a cage..... check the manifest for Elephant's weight. ...check the swl of the cargo gear if it is suitable for lifting the elephant. ....check the SWL of wires, slings etc to be used.... meanwhile prepare deck for loading. .. check the load density of deck.... prepare lashing material and lashing points on deck for lashing of cage. ... prepare and lay dunnage prior loading cage. .... lift the cage and place it on prepared deck..... lash the cage...... if the surveyor is satisfied with this.... TELL OTHERS, if not TELL ME...... LOL!!!!!!!

DB :Depends on CP Clause...whether Hague/HV rules apply to B/ allows animal ondeck and other doesnt...if doesnt then carrier is not responsible fr the elephant.....I think they want to hear something in those lines....

RML :Why u cant load these days any specific reason?

RMR :We don't load elephant these days...yes off course..we don't...elephants have started swimming through water and flying using their Giant wing like ears...Lmao...they don't load it seems...hahahaha..

MS :reading all the comments above , it makes me recall one old tale from Panchatantra where some blind men touch one elephant's body parts and each of those blind men makes his wild guess as what it could be which he is touch-feeling. Our reactions to this question is no lesser funny tale comparable to the pronouncements of those blind men.

MS :I can see that the responses of we the ''blind men'' can be categorised into small clubs. 
    Club 1 , the "oh, it's harassment" club : Back in early 2000's , Capt Das in Kolkatta often asked such nuisance questions when life and shipping had already changed so much as to have forgotten loading cargo such as Circus troop, animals , etc. I have seen vintage photographs in Calendars etc where elephant is lying up-side-down suspended in air by a derrick while it is being loaded , using slings as lifting gear. These are testimonies to the fact that, in truth, cargoes such as Elephants were indeed carried by merchant ships some decades in the past. So when these cargoes became infrequent in course of time, people forgot the care and precautions, and those group emerged as today become the blind-men club of ''oh, it's harassment to ask such questions''. 
      Club 2 of the blind-men is ''stuck in time warp'' club: those who detected out where to find information about the care and precautions for cargoes such as elephants . Say from the publication 'thomas stowage'. This club is a book-collector club which keeps compiling books/notes/publications so much and so heavy that it forgets to create a method on how to reach the relevant information from its vast stockpile, the randomly stored book. You might choose to call there stockpile a library , but he truth is that this club has failed to create a library, which is a system to home onto ANY information being searched for in a methodical manner. This club works by a 'merciful recall of memory', when if you lucky , you randomly recall the book where the information is given. 
    Club 3, ''the methodical club'': the one's who have understood the challenges which have emerged due to changing times and epoch and develop a method, a technique from law, to use Memory, but with reduced information-overloading, to reach the desired question. Certification is the first answer for them. The law-makers and policy-makers have put in place a system to deal with these, we just need to know how to follow them. If a vessel is 'certified' to carry livestock, it will also be made duty-bound to carry publications pertaining to how to load-ramp or a Mahaout, or gangway or a sling from crane, etc. The ventilation, the food, precautions with respect to other animals such as camel-elephant instinctive rivalry, etc. These publications and laws will also be mandating the manning specialization for these livestock carriers. This club is a step more evolved from Club 1 , the 'oh, it's harassment' club. The question indeed was a harassment , but a methodical response had to be generated in time to come. It's logical that 'oh , it's harassment'' can only be a reaction and never a permanent entrenched-in-time answer to a question. 
    Club 4, the 'maskhara club": cracking jokes, use cranes, ramps, mahaout, etc.

AV :MS, which club do you fall into? unless you have a suitable answer

AS :Writers club

MS :ye, I would also like to be a member of Maskhara Club. Here is my contribution Put a big-arse woman in front of the elephants and ask her to lead. Elephants will follow her arse to reach into the cargo hold.

MS : I think Capt Das himself can be enrolled as a member of Maskhara Club , under a sub-group 'Capt Das harassment' club: here the ghost of Capt Das will possess the body of any of us, and that person will start speaking 'Englis' in the typical grammar and accent of Capt Das and ask those nuisance questions just like him. Like ''Manis, how you phind('find') big-arse women then? I meen wherephrom??''

AR: in a pure academic sense answer would be .1)vet mus be present for voyage 2)hold must be prepared for elephant 3)adequate FW and food for elephant...4)documents for cargo and acceptance from the port of discharge

BS :Well said manish. H'ever all said and done, in front of surveyor we have to have an answer.

MS :To have an answer before surveyor, or to have answer to meet with the real life challenge of loading Elephant cargo , the difference is same as between the Reel Life and the Real Life. it's a quite a psychometric seizure to start viewing everyquestion/ challenge from the ''sitting before a surveyor in an oral examination'' life-frame.
  Many cinema actors are reported to become psychometrically troubled after having undergone a good professional life as an actor. They start seeing their day today life too as if they are watching a movie of themselves, from the Camera's point of view.
    MMD should intervene to prevent such seizures of the candidates on his life term. Candidates should build self-awareness to this effect.

MS :Friends, sorry for this but it looks like I have myself taken some story-writer's psychometric seizure to see this post in parallel relation with the Panchatantra Tale of 'Elephant and the Blind men'. 
  The tale was made to give the moral lesson of 'Always look at the larger picture. Otherwise, blind or not you too shall give pronouncement like the Blind-men do to the elephant'. 
   In my own story-writer's psychometric seizure , I cannot stop evaluating different response into different groups and lay bare the relation between each. Indeed the response that 'we need to have an answer for the MMD surveyors' is a Club 2 the 'stuck in time warp' response. Imagine the evolution of this club as the next quick successor of Club 1, the 'oh, it's harassment' club. When the question was first time asked , Club 1 responsers emerged. They came out of the examination room and complained their reaction 'the harassment' to their friends at the tea-stalls, coffeehouses, seamen club, etc. The next batch managed to figure out where to find that answer from - the Thomas Stowage publication. Thus came the next generation which was Club 2, the 'stuck in time warp' club. This club kept the focus only on Elephant, not on the larger sense of dealing with the strange cargoes. One response was generated for one special case of strange cargoes, but not a method of dealing with the entire spectrum of strange cargoes. Then decades later the Methodical Club emerged, club 3. amongst all this fanfare over a period of time, the Maskhara Club remained unchanged, drowned in their beer glass. 
   Let some madness be the eye-opener. Thanks for being my audience.

CS :Wo wo wo lots of comments dear ! So it's just in mmd, how cum u can face sum idiots on board if u don't hav onboard Internet facility, cum on mate take a chill pill

AM :Its easy...Open the hatch...pick up the elephant...put the elephant in the hold...close the hatch...! FINITO! SIMPLE!

CS :Buddy one more advice long back there was a advertise of Ceat tyres sayin dat the street are filled with idiots now it's same applies to all over, not only in MMD.

Lawyer lawmaker does the trickery again

Khurshid, another UPA stalwart with basic degree in Law, does all the trickery to defend his government's brazen support to Bansal at this hour of misdeeds being caught red-handed . Khurshid's claim is that "While the government is under scanner , it doesn't mean there is no government''. He augues it further in reference to CBI's un-desired involvement into Supreme Court monitored CoalGate investigations saying that ''Govt has every right to know the truth. Our discussions with the CBI on the Report of investigations was merely the exercise of our right ''! This hair-splitting dismantling of the notion of justice is a copy-book method of destroying the Justice. In the shakespearen play ''The Merchant of Venice'' , Lady Portia does the trick to save Antonio by asking Shylock of "take only a pound of flesh, but not a drop of blood must fall''.
       In philosophy, the challenges of shifting the viewpoint station closer or far from the object under view are well recognised-the Micro views and the Macro view. In Physics, the difference in the working technology and the purposes of a Telescope and a Microscope so well known. Infact the creation of two sub types of laws of Physics, the Classical Physics and the Quantum Physics, is premised on how the laws apply different as the particles' behaviour appear different when the viewpoint station changes between closer and farther.
  Given a freedom to vacilate the viewpoint station, a smart laywer in a stab killing case must just rake argument some day ''prove that the victim did not thrust his body on the sharp edge on the knife which my client was merely holding in his hand''. Or that ''while my client shot the bullet from his revolver, the victim himself chose to come in way of the flying bullet to have himself killed''.
       Khurshid does another blatant attempt to defend the indefensible.

एस्परगर सिंड्रोम

       एस्परगर सिंड्रोम (Asperger Syndrome ) नाम का मनोविकार एक "स्वलीन क्ष्रेणी के विकार" की (Autism Spectrum disorder ) समूह का बौधिक विकास सम्बंधित विकार है । इस बौधिक मनोविकार के मुख्य लक्षण हैं सामाजिक सम्बन्ध अथवा बात-व्यवहार में दिक्कत होने (या की समझ का न होना की कब, कहाँ, कैसे व्यवहार करना है ); और इसके साथ-साथ कुछ सीमित किस्म के व्यवहारों का पुनरावृत प्रदर्शन अथवा सामान्य, विस्तृत अभिरुचियों की कमी ( या की बार-बार कुछ ख़ास किस्म के व्यवहार को दोहरना )।
               एस्परगर सिंड्रोम (Asperger Syndrome ) को "स्वलीन(= जो अपने में ही तल्लीन होते है, बाहरी दुनिया से जुड़ सकने में बौधिक रूप से कुशल / सक्षम नहीं होते) क्ष्रेणी के विकार" से स्पष्ट रूप से भिन्न कर सकना थोडा मुश्किल होता है । जो कुछ अंतर है वह बस वजन और मात्रा का ही है की किस गंभीरता से भाषाई और संज्ञानात्मक(=cognitive ) विकास का आभाव हुआ है । एस्परगर सिंड्रोम में Cognitive डेवलपमेंट इतना अधिक बंधित नहीं होता माना जाता है । तो एक तरीके से एस्परगर सिंड्रोम में भी मरीज के अन्दर बोल-चाल की भाषा का अविकसित स्वरुप पाया ही जाता है , या फिर की अटपटा प्रयोग। शारीरिक संरचना और चहरे के देखने में भी कुछ फूहड़ पन होता है ।

      अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम से प्रभावित बच्चे के सामाजिक सम्बन्ध, दोस्ती, बात-चीत कर सकने में एक परिपूर्ण व्यक्तित्व नहीं रखते हैं । वह अक्सर कर के कुछ अटपटी सी बात कह देते हैं । अकसर कर के उनमे किसी वस्तु अथवा विषय को लेकर कुछ व्य्सनित करने वाली अभिरूचि मिलती है । डॉक्टर लोग 'अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम' को 'स्वलीन समूह के मनोविकार' में समूहित करते हैं । इस समूह के मनोविकार शिशुओं के विस्तृत विकास - बौधिक और शारीरिक - से सम्बंधित मनोरोगों का वर्णन करते हैं । इसलिए इस समूह को pervasive developmental disorders के नाम से भी बुलाया जाता है ।
        अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम जैसे मनोविकारो का उपचार आजतक तो खोज नहीं जा सका है , मगर इनके लक्षणों की सही जानकरी के द्वारा इनके रोगियों को एक संचालित जीवन देना,( एक बढ़िया, संतुलित जीवन जीने) में सहायत करी जा सकती है ।

 अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम के कुछ सूचक (लक्षण ) इस प्रकार हैं : 
१) किसी भी प्रकार की लम्बी , एक-तरफा बातचीत में अभ्यस्त होना , यह समझे बिना की सुनने वाला आपके बातों /विचार को सुनने में रूचि रखता है भी की नहीं । अगर श्रोता बातचीत का विषय बदलना चाहता है , कोई संकेत देता है और व्यक्ति उसे समझने में असमर्थ है , तब भी यह 'अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम' के लक्षणों में है ।
   २) बातचीत के दौरान कुछ अलग ही शारीरिक भाषा के लक्षण -- जैसे की आंख-से-आंख संपर्क की कमी , चेहरे के भावो का व्यक्त करे जा रहे विचार से ताल-मेल न होना , या पर्याप्त हाव-भाव की कमी ; ज्यादातर एक तना हुआ, 'मानो जैसे क्रोध में हो' वाला चहरे के भाव ।
 ३) बातचीत में कुछ गिने-चुने ही विषयों पर थोडा बहुत संतुलित बातचीत कर सकना । जैसे की क्रिकेट , फ़िल्म , ट्रेनों के आवागमन की जानकारी , मौसम, सांप , शेर , कुत्ते , इत्यादि । अन्य विषयों पर बातचीत में बांधा महसूस करना।
    ४) उसके भावों से यह आभास आना की वह बातचीत को समझ नहीं पा रहा है । या की वह बातचीत में वरणित विचार और भावना को सही से ग्रहण नहीं कर पा रहा है । उसके अनुरूप बातचीत की प्रतिक्रीय नहीं दे रहा है ।
 ५) दूसरो के हास्य को , भावना को, प्रसंग और अर्थ को समझने में दिक्कत ।
    ६) वाणी में सिर्फ एक ही भावना का होना -- जैसे की सिर्फ उदासीन भाव से सम्बंधित वाणी का प्रयोग , या फिर की कुछ अधिक तीव्रता से शब्दों का निष्कर्षण , या भारी आवाज ।
 ७) चलते समय चाल ढाल में हाथ पाँव में संतुलित क्रिया न होना ।

 छोटे शिशु , २ से ३ साल तक की उम्र के , अस्पेरेगर सिंड्रोम में अक्सर समय से अधिक समय बाद बातचीत आरम्भ करते हैं । वह कुछ शारीरिक क्रियाएं जैसे गेंद पकड़ना , दोस्ती करना , चेहरे के भाव में प्रतिक्रिया करना देर से आरम्भ करते हैं । वयस्क 'अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम' के रोगी अपने शरीर के संचलन में कमज़ोर होते हैं । इन्हें खेल के मैदान में सबसे पिछड़े खिलाड़ी के रूप में देखा जा सकता है । शारीरिक नियंत्रण की कमी की वजह से यह अक्सर कर के चोटिल होते रहते हैं । जैसे, अपने पास आती गेंद को सही समय में न देख पाना , या अपने शरीर को तुरंत प्रतिक्रिया कर के गेंद के रस्ते से बचा पाना । ऐसे में इन्हें चोटें ज्यादा लगती हैं ।

  कभी-कभी छोटे शिशु अपने शिशु काल में तो संतुलित रूप से जीवंत और क्रियाशील होते हैं मगर 'अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम' के लक्षण आगे बाल्य अवस्था में दिखाई देना शुरू होते है । वह अक्सर कर के युवा अवस्था में आने तक 'अवस्वाद' (=कोई अजीब सा दुःख ), या छोटी बाते पे बहोत अधिक "मनोविकृत चिंतित" (anxiety ) के रोग से ग्रस्त होने लगते हैं ।

कभी-कभी अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम से ग्रस्त बच्चे कुछ अदभुत कौशल भी दिखलाते हैं जैसे गणित , संगीत इत्यादि क्षेत्रों में । अभिरुचि का दायरा असामान्य रूप से छोटा होने की वजह से, या फिर किसी वस्तु अथवा विषय में एक व्यसन (=ग्रस्त मानसिकता) के जैसे अभिरूचि होने की वजह से वह इस छोटे क्षेत्र में कुछ अधिक ही कुशल हो जाते है । और फिर एक सामान्य कुशल मनुष्य होने का आभास देते हैं , जबकि वह असल में अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम से प्रभावित होते हैं ।   

अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम के कारक : 
अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम के सही कारकों को अभी पूरी तरह से नहीं जाना जाता है । ऐसा माना जाता है की यह शिशु को नाभिकीय अवस्था के समय हुए कुपोषण या माता को किसी मनोवैज्ञानिक दुःख/ सदमा इत्यादि से होता है जब उसके मस्तिष्क का विकास सामान्य से कुछ अलग हो जाता है । शिशु नाभिकीय अवस्था से ही सही/सामान्य मस्तिष्क संरचना नहीं प्राप्त कर पाता है । मस्तिष्क की कोशिकाएं आपसी जोड़ उचित और सामान्य नहीं रख पाती हैं ।
    आगे जन्म के उपरान्त भी परिवार में उपलब्ध माहोल "अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम" के कारणों को उत्पन्न कर सकता है , या पहले से ही मौजूद 'अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम' को गंभीर कर सकता है ।
    'अस्पेर्गेर सिंड्रोम' की पुरुष लिंग के शिशुओं में स्त्री-शिशु के अपेक्षा अधिक संभावना होती है।

the difference between US and India in reading the heart of the law pertaining to Free Speech

reference the news:
US ignores India's request against Google, Facebook   
ऐसा लगता है की कांग्रेस पार्टी की यह वकील-संग-विधेयक सिबल , तिवारी और सिंघवी की तिकड़ी को स्वतंत्र अभिव्यक्ति सम्बंधित अंतर्राष्ट्रीय मानवाधिकार नियम को समझने में कुछ कम-मानसिक क्षमता की बीमारी है । यह तीनो ही स्वतंत्र अभिव्यक्ति के मानवाधिकार नियम को कुछ यूँ पढ़ते हैं कि , "नागरिक किसी के भी सम्बन्ध में कुछ भी असत्य , द्वेष पूर्ण , निंदा पूर्ण , या अपशब्द नहीं बोल सकता । इस बहार उसे स्वतंत्र अभिव्यक्ति प्राप्त है । "
       जबकि अमरीकी और अन्तराष्ट्रीय नियम में स्वतंत्र अभिव्यक्ति को कुछ ऐसा समझा जाता है की, " नागरिक को कुछ भी भाव दिखलाने की पूर्ण स्वतंत्र अभिव्यक्ति प्राप्त होगी , हालाँकि नागरिक कोशिश करेगा की वह किसी के भी सम्बन्ध में अपनी यह स्वतंत्रता कुछ भी असत्य , द्वेष पूर्ण , निंदा पूर्ण , या अपशब्द बोलने के लिए नहीं करेगा "।
       बुद्धि से कमज़ोर इन तीन वकीलों को तिकड़ी ऊपर लिखे दोनों संदर्भो के बीच में अंतर कर सकने में असक्षम लगता है । शब्दों की स्थिति में परिवर्तन से दोनों वाक्यों के केन्द्रीय भाव में जो अंतर है, यह तीनो वकीलों विधेयक इसको समझ सकने में नाकाबिल लगते हैं ।

      It seems like Sibal, Tiwari, Singhvi have a psycho trouble in understanding the idea of free speech. These three lawyer-cum-legislators seems to read the free speech Idea and principle as " You cannot speak anything untruthful, slanderous, critical ,and obscene about anyone. Outside of this, you have free speech".
          The US founders of the nations designed the free speech idea as " You can speak anything, however avoid the untruth, slanderous, critical , obscene about anyone".
      The troika of Congress is mentally incompetent to know the difference between the two kinds of readings.

Featured Post

नौकरशाही की चारित्रिक पहचान क्या होती है?

भले ही आप उन्हें सूट ,टाई और चमकते बूटों  में देख कर चंकचौध हो जाते हो, और उनकी प्रवेश परीक्षा की कठिनता के चलते आप पहले से ही उनके प्रति नत...

Other posts