Necessity to serve the Non-partisan, 'Ideal Gas' perspective to the masses

To be able to understand the aspects of  many of posts i make, one should be able to release himself from the obsessive grip of never-ending politics, of taking side with either of the two parties ; and then think - RE-THINK the full situation from perspective of a judge or a king on how to amicably resolve a dispute among the people.  
Not everyone should become partisan in society in such hours of public distrust against one another. This moment calls for someone to provide a non-partisan view of what OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN done. Everyone is taking about what MUST be done, or what HAS BEEN DONE. There is no one to provide the IMAGINARY , THE "IDEAL GAS" PERSPECTIVE by which every one may develop a common Standards of evalution by himself of what OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN the RIGHT way.
Through these 'posts' i am striving to provide the NON-PARTISAN perspective, so that we may draw towards consensus-built solution.

It is intended through these posts to provide solution path to discover the DUE PROCESS for such scenarios that we are facing today.

We are not doing things in the right way because we do not commonly agree to what should be the due process.

By "we" , it means 'we the people',- all of us- the society , the building block of a Nation.

Indian democracy - on the road to perdition

The fact that the political parties have to plead before the Election Commission, instead of the President of India, to follow the path of logic is testimony to patent defects in the Administrative structure of this country to serve a society desirous of Democractic governance

_x_x_x_x

It is definite that Bureaucracy is that hidden 'sovereign" which is no where mentioned in the promise called as Constitution of India. The Presidency is rather a confusing rank created so to cheat the people as to who is the real holder of the Sovereign, who is capable of exercising his ULTIMATE DISCRETION when a conflict becomes chronically unresolved.

The Election Commission is controlled by the exclusive class of people - the civil Service. That means there is no place in this system for any other class of people of other occupations in this country . We may wonder as to why we call it a Democracy at all !

_x_x_x
In the theory of the subject, it was intended that the holder of the Sovereign shall wield his ULTIMATE DISCRETION to overcome all the growing politics around an unresolved issue.
The growing, prolonged politics on any issue is like a deadly disease which can kill any society from inside.
The philosophers of the original idea wanted that to deal with such a circumstances, the Sovereign shall exercise his Power of Discretion. They knew that human environment is filled with so vast gamut of idea and  thoughts that LOGIC may not be the ULTIMATE Source to solve all the dispute, even if it may be the best way.
Unfortunately, that is where we have punched too many holes because we have a system which is copied, that is, there is no ORIGINAL PHILOSOPHER to guide what was the original thought , why and how.

The EVM issue is now a living testimony of that imaginary scenario when the Power of Discretion was the best, quickest way out. Such scenario can also occur during an external agression from an enemy state. We have known and read about "Amrapali" , how King Ajatshatru had annexed the country while the politicians were still debating and arguing among themselves.

Logic has its limitations. Logic is replete with AMBIGUITY. To resolve an Ambiguity is not ergonomic most of the time, due to constraints of time, resources available at hand, the cost factor.

And then the Pressure is to randomly select a path and move along, letting the consequences be in the hands of the Almighty.

India today stands at a point where perhaps our forefathers could NOT be foresightful enough to save us from such a day.
We must take note , and built our capacity to re-find this system right from scratch as and when the opportunity may come.

_x_x_x

Imagine the scenario , if only there was a King , who were to apply his POWER OF DISCRETION.
A wrongful exercise of the Power of DISCRETION would have resulted in a CONFRONTATION between the People ( the subjects) and the King. And the outcome of this battle would have been a pure, most unadulterated DEMOCRACY.

But what have we achieved in our Public Administration system in these 70 years - a CONFRONTATION between the People and the People ! Half of them thinking that the EVM rigging is danger, and the other half is claiming that it is just an excuse of the impending defeat .

So, eventually it is People versus People fight .
Who do you think is going to be the real winner of it ??!  The Election Commission, isn't it? -- the body of the Bureaucracy, who is but the descendants from the erstwhile SERVANTS OF THE KING , and the presiding agency in this CONFRONTATION, which was no where there in the thoughts of the makers of Constitution to deal with such scenarios !

_x_x_x
If we may rethink the current situation from the thoughts of the original philosophers, then the role that the Election Commission is playing today was not intended to be played by them . It is a people versus People situation, and the very occurrence of it is a sure truth the society is headed for self-destruction.

The original thinkers had perhaps retained the separated Centre of Power so only to save this situation that any Democracy may never have to face.

Our Democracy has arrived that fearful times.

_x_x_x
Their appointment, transfer , posting , promotion is what makes the Election Commission an unfit body to play the role that they are playing.

_x_x_x

The people are likely to follow in their hearts what the leaders are going to do, no matter what the Election Commission may dictate, and what the next "elected" government may order . This will cause weakening of the government and the society.

We are walking on a path that ends in subjugation of fragmanted societies by external aggressors.

_x_x_x
Latin phrase "Rex non potest peccare" , meaning "King can do no wrong", is built on the premise that since the King itself is the judge to decide whether it has done a wrong or not, so eventually it is wiser to assume that the king can do no wrong

The Election Commission is sitting in the role of the King, which is against the choiced design of the system. But this situation has resulted because there is no rank to most satisfactorily fill the vacuum due to absence of the King !
Mr Ronen Sen, and IFS and Indian High Commissioner to the USA had once called the parliament , "a headless chicken ". Unfortunately, today's scenario is reflecting bad on the bureaucracy, that the EC is playing a role that the President, it was originally thought should, have played .

But then , even the Presidency is not designed right to deal with such situation. The power, posting , appointment is what makes the EC unfit . But so does the Presidency, that too, which is coming from a sharp division of vote, instead of a more consensual agreement.

_x_x_x

What powers does the EVM represent?

EVM represents some invisible power, which can control the socio-political life, or maybe an administrative super-power around the common man.

It is either an operative method of the super-power secretly vested in the Indian judiciary which is letting the EVMs stay around,

Or, the EVMs represent the Bureaucracy, because they are the exclusive class of people who control the Election Commission

Unfortunately, all the Constitutional post are occupied exclusively by the Bureaucracy. There is just two recorded instance when a non-IAS person has come as chairman of the UPSC. (Incidentally, one of them was CHARTED, Engineer. Now If you are interested in understanding who are the PROFESSIONALS, then look around for the meaning of CHARTED.)

So, it is done, that the EVM is a symbol of the invisible social master - like the Brahmins, in the olden times,
Or, of the Bureaucracy, in the Bureaucratic Democracy in post-independance India.

Indian Democracy is half-baked. The British who founded the Indian system were themselves the PROFESSIONAL who had brought the Bureaucracy as Babu or office-clerks to attend to their desk jobs. Thus, during the British Raj, the white man was himself the Ship Captain, and the Bureaucracy was the Purser. It has actually happened in the 1970s that the Pursers managed to pull such a strong lobby that they became the full-time owners at the shipping unions, as if more important to the running of the ships than the Captain himself. That's because the ship captains chose to be always away at sea,  not attending to the office functions where the Pursers run the office and it's desk jobs.
Only in the late 1990s did the shipowners realise that the Purser was a super-numerary, not so much essential to the Economics of the shipping business.

The Bureaucracy is that same tax-eating white elephant. Of course, they will write and speak good long essays on how important they are, more so when they have single-handed controls of all the constitutional posts in India. They will never tell you that they are largely superfluous, "super-numerary of the ship".

The Bureaucracy system is such that it is the re-written job description of the SERVANTS OF THE KING.  THINK by yourself, When India became Republic, and the post of the King was knocked down, what happened to his SERVANTS?  The Indians Bureaucracy was invented. The SERVANTS of the KING, when the King was banished, merely changed their description on paper to 'servants of the people', and descended down as the Bureaucracy, albeit retaining their powers and privileges of the King's colonial era.

The constitutional makers had a lobby of the "social justice people" who focused hard on reserving their piece in the Bureaucracy, rather than preventing the overgrowing size of the white elephant BUREAUCRACY, against the PROFESSIONALS.

The  EVM represents the consolidation of the POWER OF BUREAUCRACY. They will surely damage society .
They don't connect with the production engine of society. They are the parasites, living-off the compulsory taxes.

They have already usurped away the DEMOCRACY OF THE COMMON PEOPLE to DEMOCRACY OF THE KING'S SERVANTS (BUREAUCRACY).

What happens to the EVM issue if the LS2019 results in change of government at centre ?

यदि लोकसभा 2019 के परिणामों में मोदी जी हार जाते है और कांग्रेस आ जाती है, तब भी लोग evm से शंकमुक्त नही होने वाले है।

लोग भले मूक हो जाये, मगर शंका मुक्त नही होंगे। कारण rational thinking की काबलियत से जुड़ते हैं। rational thinking बताती रहेगी कि खतरा बस समय भर के लिए टला है, उसकी घड़ी खत्म नही हुई है।

बस, खुदा न खैर भाजपा वाले विपक्ष में आते ही evm की आशंकाओं को हवा देने में दिलचस्पी दिखाने लग जाएं ! मामला रोचक हो जाएगा, और नतीज़ों में वापस क्षेत्रीय दल मजबूत होने लगेंगे, और वापस केंद्र की कांग्रेस मनमोहन सिंह युग की कमज़ोरी में चली जायेगी, और फिर भ्रष्टचार की प्रचंड आंधी आएगी, जब सभी गठबंधन दल नोंच-नोंच कर गिद्ध की तरह सरकारी खजाने में से अपना हिस्सा खा रहे होंगे।

EVM की आशंका को फिर भाजपा तो कहीं भुनाने में नही निकल पड़ेगी? EVM की शंका लंबे समय तक अटकलें गर्म करके जनमानस को तेज़ झोंको में कभी इधर तो कभी उधर हिलाती डुलाती रहने वाली है। EVM हर बार अपने आप में एक गुप्त चुनावी मुद्दा तैयार कर देगी।

राजसी सेवा से सरकारी नौकरी तक में उलटी गंगा का निर्माण : प्रजातंत्र से मूर्खतंत्र का सफर

प्रजातन्त्र का आरंभ हुआ था जनता द्वारा राजा और उसके मुलाज़िमों के जुल्म से मुक्ति से संघर्षों के दौरान।
मगर भारत मे सब कुछ उल्टी गंगा हुआ पड़ा है। यहाँ प्रजातन्त्र का असली भोग तो राजा के मुलाज़िम , यानी नौकरशाही, ही कर रही है। देश मे सबसे बेहतरीन नौकरी - नागरिक कर्तव्यकारी टैक्स के पैसों से निकलती तन्ख्वाह, नौकरी में परम संरक्षण, स्वतः वार्षिक वृद्धि, वगैरह।

खुद से सोचिए, क्या इस देश मे किसी भी प्राइवेट सेक्टर की नौकरी में ऐसे मज़े हैं ?

नहीं, न?

प्राइवेट सेक्टर की नौकरी जोखिमों से भरि हुई है। बॉस की चालपूसी, हां में हां मिलाना, शोषण और उत्पीड़न वाले आदेशों को मानना, अधिकारों वाले कानूनों का तो गलती से आफिस में ज़िक्र भी नहीं करना,
यह होती है प्राइवेट सेक्टर कि नौकरी।

तो यह उल्टी गंगा हुई कैसे?

 संविधान निर्माताओं में शायद समाज के आर्थिकी चक्र के ज्ञान और चेतना कमज़ोर थी। वह राजसी सेवा (सरकारी नौकरी) और पेशा ( व्यवसाय ) के बीच अंतर का ज्ञान नही रखते थे।उनका पूरा का पूरा ध्यान सामाजिक न्याय पर लगाये हुए थे , क्योंकि राजसी सेवा में निवास करती शासन शक्ति की ओर ही उनका ध्यान था। उनका बस एक-दृष्टि ध्यान यही था कि राजसी नौकरी में उनका भी अंश सुनिश्चित कर लिया जाए आरक्षण नीति के माध्यम से। उनके अनुसार ऐसा करने से सामाजिक न्याय प्राप्त हो सकता था।

परिणाम स्वरूप वह राजसी सेवा के बढ़ते हुए कद को अनदेखा करते ही रहे हैं, और व्यवसायों को श्रमिक कानून के हवाले छोड़ दिया। साथ मे लेखन कार्यवाही से राजसी सेवा को जनचेतना में समाज की सेवा या देश की सेवा का व्याख्यान तो दे दिया, मगर कानूनी किताबों में राजसी सेवा को दिया गया कानूनी (राजसी) संरक्षण बरकरार रख छोड़ा।

बस। उल्टी गंगा बहना शुरू हो गयी देश मे। वर्तमान प्रजातन्त्र में आम आदमी शोषण और उत्पीड़न की नौकरी करता है, और असली भोग और मज़े सरकारी नौकर करते हैं, टैक्स के पैसे पर 😲🤔।

इंटरनेट पर कभी citehr नामक वेवसाइट देखिये, जो कि श्रमिकी और मानव संसाधन विषयों पर सबसे प्रचलित वेवसाइट में है।
यहां हर एक श्रमिक विषय पर दो विरोधाभासी तर्क बहोत उच्च कोटि अंग्रेज़ी भाषा मे लिखे हुए पढ़ने को मिल जाएंगे। मतलब यदि आप गलती से भी किसी एक तर्क को पढ़ कर प्रभावित हो कर जोश में कुछ भी कहेंगे, तो कुछ ही मिनटों में धूल चाट जाएंगे क्योंकि अगले कुछ मिनट में उस तर्क का उल्टा तर्क भी उतनी ही शक्तिशाली तरीके से प्रस्तावित हुआ मिल जाएगा।
😜😃

यह भारत के प्रजातन्त्र की जमीनी दास्ताँ है। यहां common standards नही है कानून में । कानून के उच्चारण को coma और apostrophe या full stop के माध्यम से आसानी से हर कोई अपने अपने ढंग से करता है। कानून निर्माता यानी विधायिका की मंशा का किसी को पता ही नही है, क्योंकि कानून तो वास्तव में आयात करके बनाया गया है,संसद में महज़ टेबल पीट देने से। संसदीय बहस या सामाजिक/धार्मिक मूल्यों के व्याख्यान नही किये गए हैं। इसलिए कानून के उच्चारण के असल बिंदुओं पर तो कानून अकसर ख़ुद ही गुमशुदा है , कुछ भी निदान नही देता हुआ। तो सभी दिग्गज मनाव संसाधन प्रबंधक अपनी-अपनी राय से कानून को उच्चरित करके अपने अपने संस्था में लागू करते रहते हैं।
यह हालात हैं आम आदनी के प्रजातन्त्र के। जो कि बाकायदा संविधान की छत्रछाया में ही हो रहा है।
इधर नौकरशाही इतनी विलास में है, राजसी संरक्षण के संग कि यदि लापरवाही से नागरिकों की जान भी चली जाए तो भी एक भी नौकरशाह की नौकरी पर फर्क भी नही पड़ता।
➖❌➖❌➖
अधिकांश मानव संसाधन प्रबंधकों के ज्ञान के अनुसार छुट्टी यानी अवकाश किसी कर्मचारी का कानूनी अधिकार नही है। यानी अगर मालिक या बॉस ने छुट्टी नही दी, तो फिर छुट्टी पर नही जाया जा सकता है।
🤔
देश मे ऐसे दिग्गज मानव संसाधन शास्त्रियों की शुमार है आधुनिक प्रजातन्त्र के अंदर। या शायद यह मानव संसाधन के शैक्षिक पाठ्यक्रमों के स्तर है।
मगर वही कुछ ऐसे भी दिग्गज मानव संसाधन शास्त्री है जो कि बताएंगे कि अवकाश भी कर्मचारी के भुगतान का ही अंश है, और इसलिए उसकी तनख्वाह की ही तरह उसका अधिकार है। मालिक की अनुमति तो महज एक easement है अधिकार को भोग करने के मार्ग में।

Democracy - of the Government Servants OR of the Common people

The west is concerned that the Democratic nations that took birth after the world war-II, most of them are heading towards self-destruction.  The public administration systems, the Democratic Government mechanisms were not "homegrown" but rather "imported", self-styled "jugaad" adaptions of the original systems of the west itself.
Thus, the Government systems are confused and deprived of any streamlined singular Philosophy around which their theories and Principles could emerge. The localised adaptions have led to the insular design of most of their prevailing Government systems, which, in best judgement are no system at all.
One of this new-born nation wanted to not to have the system of Kingdom. It, therefore, made the adaption by knocking out the system of King-sovereign and replaced it with the Presidency. In the bargain, it forgets to eradicate the "Servants of the Kings" system. Thus, the King was 'out' but his Servants were still around! They turned into the Government Servants with the same sets of privileges, albeit without any overlord to supervise them. The publicly elected representatives became puppets for the Government Servants to Rig the show of Democracy in their personal interest.
The system of Democracy, now as it stands, is a "Democracy of the Government Servants" instead of the "Democracy of the common people".

Insular learning and philosophically-nourished learning

Knowledge, when acquired insularly, comes by Rote-learning process. It then fails to make any sense to the learners, as it fails to invoke a critical thought among them.

A teacher must have good insight into the philosophy of lots of things of common interest, as that may come of help to him to connect the pieces of knowledge that he wants to impart to his learners, in a connected, streamlined link to a pre-acquired 'interesting' subject, instead of the isolatedly informed piece of knowledge, to which the learner may feel pressed to acquire only by Rote-learning. A good teacher makes a story of the knowledge to assemble the concepts, one on top of other, inside the mind of his learner. The story can better relay the material towards the self-discovery of the Concept by the learner, than an isolated introduction of the idea.

The story can help build the INTEREST in the form of a connected link piece of the chain. INTEREST is the most prized behaviour of mind which is necessary for the acquisition of the knowledge.

The insular learning, which comes when the teacher is not deep enough around the philosophy of commonly found ideas, can wreak havoc on the wholesome meaning of the Concept. His method carries in it the risk of twisting and convoluting the original theories and principles to just the opposite meaning. This because the potential learner has no means to 'play monkeys" with the concept, to check it from different angles and aspect. The learner is forced to become rigid in choosing the direction of his approach to the concept. He loses the ability to Judge and to evaluate by himself. He cannot afford a critical thought any more.

The society is bound to suffer in such an environment of the education system, as there will be lawyers armed with the legal knowledge, SANS the insight on Social, political and economic history. There will be judges before whom the Conscience driven man will have to make more hard struggles to prove his correctness. There will be doctors, who would fail to cure the problem, but simply treat a condition.

Insular learning , displacing away  the philosophically-nourished learning, is bound to give learners deprived of Critical thought.

Youtube and practitioners of Insular teaching method

Just thought of searching the youtube on the difference in the terms 'Lawyers', 'Advocate', 'Barrister,' 'Solicitors'.

The other day, I searched for Youtube 's understanding of 'what is the Rule of Law'.

There is one thing I came to understand,
that the Youtube is filled with Phony Scholarship found among the Indians. There are lots of video available, maybe in lakhs and crores, which mislead and miseducate the common people about certain things.

If ever u want to understand these things authentically, then you must always search for Youtube videos coming from a foreign country.

The Indians have perhaps created a breed of Phony Scholars - the "book worms"- who see knowledge from the eyes of the book, instead of original philosophers, the fountainhead of the knowledge.

Youtube scholarly topic video by Indians spread among the masses the "Bookworm" understanding, where the only remedy you have is to Rote-learn the topic. The piece of knowledge will almost certainly fail to stimulate your thoughts by fitting the Information correctly in the ideas that you may already hold. Since the piece of knowledge appears as an isolated, unconnected thought, you are automatically forced to acquire it in your brain by Rote-learning method. The piece of knowledge will never inspire you to think critically about anything that you may already be knowing of, and that's because of its insular presentation.

Fake degree and Phony Scholarship

More dangerous than the issue of Fake Degree is the case of Phony Scholarship.
A Phony Scholar is someone whose degree and certificates are all authentic, BUT for his knowledge in the subject.
A Phony Scholar is more dangerous because only very few people in the society can identify him, -- only those who hold genuine knowledge in those subjects.
To the others, a Phony Scholar, being unidentified, he misleads and mis-propagates. Rather, he causes the right and authentic knowledge to become convoluted and twisted, thereof creating more challenges before the society to differ between the Right Knowledge and the Wrong one.
In simple terms, a phoney scholar manages to create the duplicate of the Right Knowledge and thus he cheats away to perpetuity the struggles to bringing a social awakening!

रचनात्मकता की कमी, बदलाव में नियंत्रण लगाने की तरीकों की खोज

*रचनात्मकता की कमी* हमारे देश के बुद्धिजीवियों के दर्शन में सबसे कमजोर बिंदु है।

क्या आप इस देश में एक ऐसा क्षेत्र, एक ऐसी पार्टी, बता सकते हैं जो कि बाप-बेटावाद से मुक्त है?

नहीं न ?

जी हां। यह कुछ ऐसा ही है जैसे गरीब उत्पीड़ित लोगो की क्रांति में होता है। वह उत्पीड़न और शोषण से परेशान हो कर विद्रोह करते हैं, क्रांति लाते हैं।
मगर फिर उसके दर्शन में *रचनात्मक्ता की कमी* होती है। क्रांति के बाद तख्तापलट होता है, और जब सत्ता उनके हाथों में आती है तो वापस वही करना चालू कर देते हैं जिससे कि वापस उत्पीड़न और शोषण की नई दास्ताँ शुरू हो जाती है।

यह देशों में देखा गया है। फ्रांस की क्रांति के बाद उनका संविधान कम से कम 5 बार पूरा का पूरा बदला गया है , मगर आज तक समाज मे शांति और स्थिरता नही ले सका है। फ्रांस आज भी उत्पीड़न और शोषण में संवेदनशील है, भेदभाव और vvip संस्कृति से ग्रस्त है।

स्थिरता का आरंभ बहोत ही जटिल बिंदु से होता है- बदलाव को नियंत्रित करने से। मगर बदलाव प्रकृति की सबसे बड़ी शक्ति है, हर व्यक्ति हर वस्तु की चाहत है।

तो फिर स्थिरता आएगी कैसे?

शायद समाज मे स्थिरता और बदलाव के बड़े बीज एक संग डालने पड़ेंगे, की  दोनों आवश्कयता अनुसार प्राप्त किया जा सके। स्थिरता आती है जब किसी एक रेखा पर चलते हुए उसमे अनुभवों के अनुसार बदलाव करते रहे तो। यानी एक-पंथ होना और बदलाव करते रहना, दोनों ही एक संग, तभी स्थिरता को प्राप्त करना संभव है। यदि बदलाव को प्रकृति की परम शक्ति मान कर हर पद, हर स्थान पर बदलाव को स्थान दे बैठे तो आप अस्थिरता को खुला न्यौता दे बैठेंगे, जब u turn और ढोंग समाज का सर्वसाधारण आचरण बन जायेग।

थोड़ा और आसान शब्दो मे बात को समझें तो evolution और change में अंतर को गौर करिये। evolution के पथ को खुला रखना होगा, मगर change यानी changing the goal post वाले हालात से बचना होगा।

हमारे देश ने changing the goal post वाली राह पकड़ी हुई है। यहां सब कुछ अस्थिर है, क्योंकि कोई भी बदलाव जरूरत के अनुसार स्थिर नही क्या जा सकता है। यदि केजरीवाल अच्छी सरकार चला रहे हैं तो भी यह सम्भव नही की हम उसे स्थिर बना सकें। जैसे ही केजरीवाल सत्ता से बाहर निकलेंगे, यह तयशुदा किस्मत मान लीजिए कि नौकरशाही सब कुछ वापस पहले जैसा कर देगी - वही बदहाली, वही खस्तापन, वही घूसखोरी।

अस्थिरता के दुष्परिणाम यह होते हैं कि जो वर्ग अधिकः शक्तिशाली होते हैं वह आर्थिक टुकड़े पर पकड़ मजबूत करते चले जाते है। यह बारबार घटता ही रहता है जबतक की विद्रोह और क्रांति नही होती। और फिर यदि क्रांति के बाद बदलाव के बिंदु सही न हों तो वापस यह प्रक्रिया घटने लगती है।

ब्रिटेन इस मामले में फ्रांस से अलग है। ब्रिटेन स्थिरता का अच्छा उदाहरण है। वहां कई प्रक्रियाएं 13 शताब्दी से आरम्भ हुई है और आजतक बदस्तूर चालू हैं। multi culturalism ने समस्याएं बड़ाई है, मगर फिर भी समाज मे स्थिरता बनी हुई है।।राजशाही वही बारहवीं शताब्दी से पैर जमाये हुई है। यह रचनात्मकता की देन है। स्वतंत्र अभिव्यक्ति को सही तरीके से प्रयोग किया गया है रचनात्मकता की प्रक्रिया को प्राप्त करने के लिए। राजशाही ने रचनात्मकता में evolution के मार्ग खोल कर random change के मार्ग पर अवरोध बनाया हुआ है। संविधान आज तक लिखित ही नही हुआ है, मौखिक common law पर सब कुछ चलता है , मगर फिर भी बदस्तूर है। काफी हदों तक सुचारू है।

क्या कारण हो सकते हैं?

शायद यही की बदलाव के बीच मे कही एक न बदलने वाला बीज भी जमा हुआ है। राजशाही।

The falling accreditation of the official Public Address system

Indian Army 's Twitter handle is being operated to poorly accredited thoughts and Information.
What the Indian Army has reported of as sighting of Yeti's footmarks, the Nepalese Army informs that they are snow bear 's footmarks.

Now we may wonder why this whole where-is-the-Evidence and ' Distrust in our own army institutions' saga is playing in the masses. The accreditation had already fallen, the Yeti thing is just a continued proof of undeserving, haughty command at the controls.

Ideally, it is a wise behaviour to make public the sightings of an unexplained phenomenon so that a large mass churning exercise may begin leading to the explorations. The only big catch is that the language used for reporting the preliminary Information must be able to sufficiently address to the nature of Information (being Pre-investigative) rather than rushing to take the credits of a new finding. This, to ensure that embarrassments don't occur and the public accreditation does not fall.

Lest you become a Punjab Kesari.

The Problem of lacking STANDARDISATION thinktanks in Indian Society

CiteHr is one very famous website which is used for informing one about the labour laws and human resource management issues. But if you may ever run through any of the labour law related tricky situations being "debated" on this website, you would notice that for every aspect of the trickiness of the matter, there are very strong and well-written arguments about both the opposite -- competing - aspects of the problem. NOW if you may know anything about the rules of "Interpretation of Statutes", you would wonder as to how such competing aspects have not been solved by the labour-law related 'Act of the Parliament' which is in place. Rather, why is the prevailing law itself the genesis of the trickiness leading to the "debate"! 

In truth, that kind of "debate" should have resolved and concluded at the time of the composing of the labour law at the Parliament. But instead, THAT IS what you would witness happening at the CiteHr and after the enactment of the labour law!

Most of the times, the debate truly is an argument around the "Interpretation of the statute" with respect to the intention of the lawmakers! So,  in summary you may possibly home to the point that the labour law "debates" on the website CiteHr are outcome of the absence of fair knowledge of the "Intentions of the lawmaker", which possibly has happened because our labour laws are largely an IMPORT from the western countries, where they have originated from their own moral, cultural and religious values. The Indian - Hindu-moral,  cultural and religious values in regard to the human being as a Labour Resources don't offer such laws to the society. That is why there is so much confusion about judging the "intention" of the lawmakers, which is why there is a complete absence of the knowledge about the "intentions of the lawmakers". And it is this absence of knowledge, which in turn, is always  leading to the problem of "interpretation of statutes" , and this is what you see in the form of the "debates". !!

The FUNNY CATCH is that the labour laws of India are not the solutions of the problems in labour matters, BUT rather they SIRE the problems in LABOUR matters !
Laugh heartily if you may ! :) :D

–x–x–x

The appropriate think tank body which may bring about a Standardisation, - THE PROFESSIONAL BODY (of Human Resources PROFESSIONAL , in the case at the point)- is absent in Indian society 

This is the root of troubles in India wrt weak operational and  labour /human resource laws  - the Profession matters laws. The PROFESSIONAL BODY opinion is ABSENT, and in lieu, the PRIVATE OPINION of a Professional is taken to Fill that vacuum. This is because the bureacracy is led by the  CLERK-Intelligence people. They lack the knowledge to make a distinction between opinion given by a PROFESSIONAL BODY vis-a-vis PRIVATE OPINION of a Professional who is sitting in the bureaucracy.

The hallmark of Standardisation is that for a given Society , nation or a country - THE STANDARDS cannot - CAN NEVER BE- more than one (Lest the Justice may be lost away to realpolitik ).

Unfortunately, the great leaders of India have spoken about the importance of one-ness of language , religion , the constitution book,

BUT never about the STANDARDS ! The great leaders have not yet identified the mechanics of STANDARDISATION , how that is achieved , how that helps to resolve the crisis of MULTIPLE OPINIONS in a single society, leading to the occurrence of the problem of "Politics" (or realpolitik).

EVM की सेटिंग के लिए न्यूनतम कितनी मशीनें काबू में करनी चाहिए?

लंदन स्कूल ऑफ एकोनिमोक्स ने एक शोध के बाद बताया था आधुनिक प्रजातंत्रों में जहां आये दिन राजनैतिक पार्टियां जन्म ले रही है, तो फिर मतदान में बहुमत प्राप्त करने के लिए कुल मत अनुपात दिन-ब-दिन घटता ही जा रहा है। आजकल किसी भी प्रजातन्त्र में शासन शक्त पार्टी अपनी आबादी के मात्र 20 से 30 प्रतिशत जनसंख्या का ही प्रतिनिधत्व कर रही होती है , जिन्होंने उस पार्टी के चुनाव पर अपनी मुहर लगाई हुई होती है।

बरहाल, इस शोध का बड़ा ज्ञान यह था कि यदि मतदान के लिए electronic voting जैसे असुरक्षित पद्धतियां अपनाई जाएं, तो फिर किसी मतदान में चोरी से विजयी होने के लिए किसी पार्टी को जो प्रतिशत EVM काबू में लेनी होगी वह है मात्र 5 % !!!!!
शोध के अनुसार सभी EVM पर कब्ज़ा करने की ज़रूरत नही है। न ही सिर्फ EVM fixing को रणनीति में लगाया जाए। यानी मत विजय करने के अन्य उपाय भी लागू रखें जाए। तो फिर किसी भी हारती हुई पार्टी को जीतने के लिए सिर्फ 100 में 5 मशीनें ही काफी है विजयी बना देने के लिए।

लंदन अर्थशास्त्र विद्यायल विश्व के सर्वोच्च शैक्षिक संस्थाओं में भी सबसे उच्च सूची में शामिल है। यह शोध इसलिए जरूरी था, क्योंकि संयुक्त राष्ट्र जैसी अंतरराष्ट्रीय संस्था के गिरती हुई साख, विफलता के कारणों को टटोला जा रहा है। संयुक्त राष्ट्र यानी UN जैसी संस्था विश्व शांति और स्थिरता के लिये बनाई गई थीं। इसमे तमाम देशों का प्रतिनिधतीव उनकी सरकारें करती है। अब अगर देशों में सरकार बनाने की पद्धति ही अशुद्ध हो रही है, तो फिर संयुक्त राष्ट्र में पारित निर्णय वास्तव में विश्व की बहुमत आबादी के हैं ही नहीं। बल्कि दमनकारी , शोषण कर्ता वर्ग के हैं।

इस शोध को रूस, तुर्की और मध्य पूर्व खाड़ी देशों की सरकार निर्माण प्रक्रियाओं को नज़र में रखते हुए किया गया था। यह अकस्माक ही था कि भारत मे भी Evm का मुद्दा ठीक तब ही निकल आया जब यह शोध की रिपोर्ट बाहर आने ही वाली थी।

तो अब इस शोध के बड़े बिंदु को भारत के मतदाता को हमेशा स्मरण रखना पड़ेगा यदि वह कभी भी शंका में आये की क्या वाकई में EvM की सेटिंग होती है। यदि लोकसभा 2019 चुनावों में वर्तमान सत्तारूढ़ पार्टी यह चुनाव पराजित भी हो जाये, तब भी। क्योंकि 5% सिर्फ न्यूनतम संख्या ही है, जिसकी शर्त यह है कि EVM का भोग करने के लिए अन्य रणनीतियां और उपाय भी जारी रखते हुए ही EVM  की सेटिंग फिलहाल के समय में काम करेगी।

Government licensing authority and a demand for test of Psychology of the driving license candidate

Driving is actually a work of Human Psychology. Driving has huge connection with the personality traits of a person.

A rash driver, very surely , will also be a rash decision-maker, a rash commentator.

His car and the collision marks will reflect his rash driving and thereof may suggest of the personality traits of the driver to great accuracy .

Driving is actually done from Habits of a man. Driving is part of every person's *auto-pilot behavior* .  Auto-pilot behavior is when a person thoughtlessly, - Mechanically-  conducts *by himself* .

Unfortunately this is one department where the government is not doing anything in regard to safety on roads. The test of the Psychology of the potential driving-license candidate. A regular intervals, rigorous test that the person is Psychology suited to take-up the driving duties and so he does not act J to negligence and rashness.

Unwittingly this same is also the one test that the Government agencies are ill-known for - subjecting every common-man into a test of his patience to its extreme when he comes to government offices  for any  public works, other than applying for driving  license  !!

The government fails to be its regular self just when it is expected from them to be so.